Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khanna, N.
Right arrow Articles by Tice, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow G32 - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure
Right arrow L11 - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms
Right arrow L81 - Retail and Wholesale Trade; e-Commerce
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rev Fin 2000; 13:749-779
© 2000 the Society for Financial Studies


Article

Strategic responses of incumbents to new entry: the effect of ownership structure: capital structure, and focus

N Khanna and S Tice1
Michigan State University, USA
1 Tulane University, USA
Correspondence to: N Khanna, 320 Eppley Center, Eli Broad College of Business, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
e-mail: khanna@pilot.msu.edu

Abstract

We examine how certain firm- and market-specific characteristics affect incumbent firms' responses to new entry into their local markets. Data comes from the discount department store industry where Wal-Mart entered a large number of markets in a short period of time. Consistent with existing research, larger and more profitable incumbents respond more aggressively to Wal-Mart's entry, while more highly levered incumbents respond less aggressively. Also, there is evidence that incumbent managers fight harder (possibly overinvest) when their job is at greater risk and high managerial ownership appears to reduce this agency problem. Incumbent firms behave differently in markets under attack by Wal-Mart than in markets not yet threatened, suggesting that some of the documented responses are specific to Wal-Mart's entry.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REV FINANC STUDHome page
A. Ali, S. Klasa, and E. Yeung
The Limitations of Industry Concentration Measures Constructed with Compustat Data: Implications for Finance Research
Rev. Financ. Stud., October 1, 2009; 22(10): 3839 - 3871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
REV FINANC STUDHome page
P. Pichler, A. Stomper, and C. Zulehner
Why Leverage Affects Pricing
Rev. Financ. Stud., July 1, 2008; 21(4): 1733 - 1765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.