| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rev Fin 2001; 14:407-431
© 2001 the Society for Financial Studies
Article |
Optimal portfolio choice and the valuation of illiquid securities
Anderson School, UCLA, Box 951481, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1481, USA
E-mail: francis.longstaff@anderson.ucla.edu
Abstract
Traditional models of portfolio choice assume that investors can continuously trade unlimited amounts of securities. In reality, investors face liquidity constraints. I analyze a model where investors are restricted to trading strategies that are of bounded variation. An investor facing this type of illiquidity behaves very differently from an unconstrained investor. A liquidity-constrained investor endogenously acts as if facing borrowing and short-selling constraints, and one may take riskier positions than in liquid markets. I solve for the shadow cost of illiquidity and show that large price discounts can be sustained in a rational model.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Chan and J. K.H. Kwok Market Segmentation and Share Price Premium: Evidence from Chinese Stock Markets Journal of Emerging Market Finance, April 1, 2005; 4(1): 43 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
