Rev Fin 2003; 16:345-384
© 2003 the Society for Financial Studies
Market Making with Costly Monitoring: An Analysis of the SOES Controversy
HEC School of Management and CEPR
Princeton University and CEPR
University of Pennsylvania and CEPR
Address correspondence to: Patrik Sandås, Finance Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Steinberg HallDietrich Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, or e-mail: sandas{at}wharton.upenn.edu.
Abstract
This article presents a model of information monitoring and market making in a dealership market. We model how intensively dealers monitor public information to avoid being picked off by professional day traders when monitoring is costly. Price competition among dealers is hampered by their incentives to share monitoring costs. The risk of being picked off by the day traders makes dealers more competitive. The interaction between these effects determines whether a firm quote rule improves trading costs and price discovery. Our empirical results support the prediction that professional day traders prefer stocks with small spreads, but offer less support for the prediction that their trading leads to wider spreads.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. De Winne and C. D'hondt Hide-and-Seek in the Market: Placing and Detecting Hidden Orders Review of Finance, June 4, 2007; (2007) rfm0016v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
