Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on October 15, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/849    most recent
hhg051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, I.
Right arrow Articles by Nyborg, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D44 - Auctions
Right arrow G12 - Asset Pricing; Trading volume; Bond Interest Rates
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rev Fin 2004; 17:849-877
The Review of Financial Studies Vol. 17, No. 3 © 2004 The Society for Financial Studies; all rights reserved.

Underpricing and Market Power in Uniform Price Auctions

Ilan Kremer
Stanford University

Kjell G. Nyborg
Centre for Economic Policy Research, UCLA Anderson School of Management

Address correspondence to Kjell G. Nyborg, UCLA Anderson School of Management, Box 951481, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1481, or e-mail: kjell.nyborg{at}anderson.ucla.edu.

In uniform auctions, buyers choose demand schedules as strategies and pay the same "market clearing" price for units awarded. Despite the widespread use of these auctions, the extant theory shows that they are susceptible to arbitrarily large underpricing. We make a realistic modification to the theory by letting prices, quantities, and bids be discrete. We show that underpricing can be made arbitrarily small by choosing a sufficiently small price tick size and a sufficiently large quantity multiple. We also show how one might improve revenues by modifying the allocation rule. A trivial change in the design can have a dramatic impact on prices. Our conclusions are robust to bidders being capacity constrained. Finally, we examine supply uncertainty robust equilibria.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.