RFS Advance Access originally published online on October 15, 2003
Review of Financial Studies 2004 17(4):1015-1041; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhg062
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prospect Theory and Mean-Variance Analysis
Hebrew University
Hebrew University
Address correspondence to Haim Levy, Jerusalem School of Business Administration, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91905, Israel, or e-mail: mshlevy{at}mscc.huji.ac.il
The experimental results of prospect theory (PT) reveal suggest that investors make decisions based on change of wealth rather than total wealth, that preferences are S-shaped with a risk-seeking segment, and that probabilities are subjectively distorted. This article shows that while PT's findings are in sharp contradiction to the foundations of mean-variance (MV) analysis, counterintuitively, when diversification between assets is allowed, the MV and PT-efficient sets almost coincide. Thus one can employ the MV optimization algorithm to construct PT-efficient portfolios.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. N. Tobler, G. I. Christopoulos, J. P. O'Doherty, R. J. Dolan, and W. Schultz Risk-dependent reward value signal in human prefrontal cortex PNAS, April 28, 2009; 106(17): 7185 - 7190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
