RFS Advance Access originally published online on October 15, 2003
Review of Financial Studies 2004 17(4):1167-1184; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhg061
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Value of Voting Rights to Majority Shareholders: Evidence from Dual-Class Stock Unifications
Ben-Gurion University and Rutgers University
Bar-Ilan University
Address correspondence to Beni Lauterbach, School of Business Administration, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52900, Israel, or e-mail: lauteb{at}mail.biu.ac.il.
We study 84 dual-class stock unifications, where superior vote shareholders gave up their superior voting status (all firm stocks became "one share one vote") and received (in most cases) compensation in the form of additional shares. Unifications are essentially intrafirm transactions of voting rights, and afford observation of the intrafirm-assessed price of vote. The price of vote in unifications (1) increases with the percentage vote lost by the majority shareholders, (2) is higher in family-controlled firms, (3) decreases with institutional investor holdings, and (4) is similar to the "outside" price of vote implicit in the market prices of stocks.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Burkart and S. Lee One Share - One Vote: the Theory Review of Finance, January 9, 2008; (2008) rfm035v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Adams and D. Ferreira One Share-One Vote: The Empirical Evidence Review of Finance, January 1, 2008; 12(1): 51 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
