RFS Advance Access originally published online on February 10, 2005
Review of Financial Studies 2005 18(2):491-533; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhi017
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumption and Portfolio Choice over the Life Cycle
London Business School
London Business School
INSEAD
Address correspondence to: Francisco Gomes, London Business School, Regent's Park, London NW1 4SA, United Kingdom, or e-mail: fgomes{at}london.edu. The usual disclaimer applies
This article solves a realistically calibrated life cycle model of consumption and portfolio choice with non-tradable labor income and borrowing constraints. Since labor income substitutes for riskless asset holdings, the optimal share invested in equities is roughly decreasing over life. We compute a measure of the importance of human capital for investment behavior. We find that ignoring labor income generates large utility costs, while the cost of ignoring only its risk is an order of magnitude smaller, except when we allow for a disastrous labor income shock. Moreover, we study the implications of introducing endogenous borrowing constraints in this incomplete-markets setting.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Christiansen, J. S. Joensen, and J. Rangvid Are Economists More Likely to Hold Stocks? Review of Finance, January 1, 2008; 12(3): 465 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
