Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on February 21, 2006
Review of Financial Studies 2006 19(3):967-1000; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhj021
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/3/967    most recent
hhj021v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hauswald, R.
Right arrow Articles by Marquez, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Competition and Strategic Information Acquisition in Credit Markets

Robert Hauswald
Kogod School of Business, American University

Robert Marquez
W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University

Address correspondence to R. Hauswald, Kogod School of Business, American University, Washington, DC 20016-8044, or email: hauswald{at}american.edu.

We investigate the interaction between banks’ use of information acquisition as a strategic tool and their role in promoting the efficiency of credit markets when a bank’s ability to gather information varies with its distance to the borrower. We show that banks acquire proprietary information both to soften lending competition and to extend their market share. As competition increases, investments in information acquisition fall, leading to lower interest rates but also to less efficient lending decisions. Consistent with the recent wave of bank acquisitions, we also find that merging for informational reasons with a competitor is an optimal response to industry consolidation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REV FINANC STUDHome page
A. W. Butler
Distance Still Matters: Evidence from Municipal Bond Underwriting
Rev. Financ. Stud., April 1, 2008; 21(2): 763 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.