Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on July 1, 2006
Review of Financial Studies 2007 20(2):491-527; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhl015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/491    most recent
hhl015v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cuñat, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D92 - Intertemporal Firm Choice and Growth, Investment, or Financing
Right arrow G21 - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
Right arrow G22 - Insurance; Insurance Companies
Right arrow G30 - General
Right arrow G32 - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure
Right arrow L14 - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation; Networks
Right arrow M13 - New Firms; Startups
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Trade Credit: Suppliers as Debt Collectors and Insurance Providers

Vicente Cuñat
Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Address correspondence to Vicente Cuñat, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, C/ Ramon Trias Fargas 25–27, Barcelona 08005, Spain, or e-mail: vicente.cunat{at}upf.edu.


   Abstract

This article examines how in a context of limited enforceability of contracts suppliers may have a comparative advantage over banks in lending to customers because they are able to stop the supply of intermediate goods. Suppliers may act also as liquidity providers, insuring against liquidity shocks that could endanger the survival of their customer relationships. The relatively high implicit interest rates of trade credit are the result of insurance and default premiums that are amplified whenever suppliers face a relatively high cost of funds. I explore these effects empirically for a panel of UK firms. (JEL: G30, M130, D920)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REV FINANC STUDHome page
M. Giannetti, M. Burkart, and T. Ellingsen
What You Sell Is What You Lend? Explaining Trade Credit Contracts
Rev. Financ. Stud., November 24, 2008; (2008) hhn096v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.