Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on July 6, 2006
Review of Financial Studies 2007 20(3):651-707; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhl021
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/651    most recent
hhl021v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ang, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bekaert, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow C51 - Model Construction and Estimation
Right arrow C52 - Model Evaluation and Testing
Right arrow E49 - Other
Right arrow F30 - General
Right arrow G12 - Asset Pricing
Right arrow C12 - Hypothesis Testing
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Stock Return Predictability: Is it There?

Andrew Ang
Columbia University and NBER

Geert Bekaert
Columbia University, NBER and CPER

Address correspondence to Geert Bekaert, Columbia Business school, Room 802, Uris Hall, 3022 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, or e-mail: gb241{at}columbia.edu.

We examine the predictive power of the dividend yields for forecasting excess returns, cash flows, and interest rates. Dividend yields predict excess returns only at short horizons together with the short rate and do not have any long-horizon predictive power. At short horizons, the short rate strongly negatively predicts returns. These results are robust in international data and are not due to lack of power. A present value model that matches the data shows that discount rate and short rate movements play a large role in explaining the variation in dividend yields. Finally, we find that earnings yields significantly predict future cash flows. (JEL C12, C51, C52, E49, F30, G12)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICSHome page
P. C. Schotman, R. Tschernig, and J. Budek
Long Memory and the Term Structure of Risk
J. Financial Econometrics, July 23, 2008; (2008) nbn010v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 REV FINANC STUDHome page
J. H. Cochrane
The Dog That Did Not Bark: A Defense of Return Predictability
Rev. Financ. Stud., July 1, 2008; 21(4): 1533 - 1575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 REV FINANC STUDHome page
Y. Amihud, C. M. Hurvich, and Y. Wang
Multiple-Predictor Regressions: Hypothesis Testing
Rev. Financ. Stud., June 13, 2008; (2008) hhn056v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 REV FINANC STUDHome page
G. Bekaert, C. R. Harvey, and C. Lundblad
Liquidity and Expected Returns: Lessons from Emerging Markets
Rev. Financ. Stud., November 1, 2007; 20(6): 1783 - 1831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.