Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on January 22, 2007
Review of Financial Studies 2007 20(4):1183-1218; doi:10.1093/revfin/hhm001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/4/1183    most recent
hhm001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eaves, J.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D44 - Auctions
Right arrow Q13 - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; [...]
Right arrow G13 - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
Right arrow G14 - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies.

Walrasian Tâtonnement Auctions on the Tokyo Grain Exchange

James Eaves
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Jeffrey Williams
University of California at Davis

Address correspondence to Jeffrey Williams, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616-8512, or e-mail: williams{at}primal.ucdavis.edu

JEL: D44, D53, G13, G14, Q13


   Abstract

The Tokyo Grain Exchange (TGE)’s itayose mechanism provides the opportunity to analyze functioning Walrasian tâtonnement auctions (WTA). In 15,677 auctions conducted over 1997–1998 for corn and redbean futures contracts, price formation is unexpectedly similar to that observed in continuous double auctions. Provisional prices and pledges are informative. In contrast to behavior observed in experiments, few pledges are deceptive, because the traders participate repeatedly and because the auctioneer has flexibility when changing the provisional price and ending the auction. Both the risk of the auction ending and the more equitable dispersion of information increase depth and the speed at which information is embodied in price.


We would like to thank many people at the Tokyo Grain Exchange: Messrs. Takao Morizane, Masanori Hayashi, and Itsuji Yanagisawa who encouraged our research; Messrs. Hidetoshi Hamada, Kunimitsu Ito, Yoshihiko Shiina, and Masahiro Yamashita who arranged interviews with traders and auctioneers; Messrs. Masato Kobayashi and Hideyuki Yamada who retrieved the electronic transcripts; and Messrs. Osamu Akimoto, Toshihiro Hirayama, Hideki Nakamichi, and Mikio Suzuki who explained their approach as auctioneers. For help on the VAR estimation, we would like to thank Sandeep Mohapatra.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.