Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on January 22, 2007
Review of Financial Studies 2007 20(4):983-1020; doi:10.1093/revfin/hhm004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/4/983    most recent
hhm004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by He, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow C73 - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; [...]
Right arrow G24 - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies.

A Theory of IPO Waves

Ping He
Department of Finance, University of Illinois at Chicago and Lehman Brothers

Address correspondence to Ping He, 601 S Morgan, UH 2431, Chicago, IL 60607, or e-mail: heping{at}uic.edu

JEL: G24, C73


   Abstract

In the IPO market, investors coordinate on acceptable IPO price based on the performance of past IPOs, and this generates an incentive for investment banks to produce information about IPO firms. In hot periods, the information produced by investment banks improves the quality of IPO firms, and this allows ex ante low quality firms to go public and increases the secondary market price, thus synchronizing high IPO volumes and high first day returns. When investment banks behave asymmetrically in information production, the "reputations" of investment banks are interpreted as a form of market segmentation to economize on the social cost of information production.


This is a revised version of the third chapter of my PhD dissertation at the University of Pennsylvania. I am in debt to my dissertation advisor, Gary Gorton, for his enlightening supervision and tremendous encouragement. Invaluable advice is greatly appreciated from the other members of my dissertation committee, George Mailath, Richard Kihlstrom, Nicholas Souleles and Armando Gomes. I am grateful for insightful comments and constructive suggestions from Maureen O'Hara (the editor) and an anonymous referee. I also want to thank Michael Brennan, Richard Rosen and the seminar participants from University of Pennsylvania, Carnegie Mellon University, University of Illinois at Chicago, New York Fed and Chicago Fed for helpful discussions. Financial supports from the Department of Economics at the University of Pennsylvania and the Department of Finance at the University of Illinois at Chicago are gratefully acknowledged.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.