Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on May 26, 2008
Review of Financial Studies 2008 21(4):1733-1765; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn048
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/4/1733    most recent
hhn048v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pichler, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zulehner, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
Right arrow G31 - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies
Right arrow L83 - Sports; Gambling; Recreation; Tourism
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Why Leverage Affects Pricing

Pegaret Pichler
Institute for Advanced Studies and Vienna Graduate School of Finance

Alex Stomper
Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna Graduate School of Finance, and MIT Sloan School of Management

Christine Zulehner
University of Vienna

Address correspondence to Alex Stomper, 50 Memorial Drive, Cambridge MA 02142; e-mail: astomper{at}mit.edu.

JEL Classification: D43, G31, L83


  Abstract

We explain and provide evidence for effects of leverage on pricing. Our model identifies two effects that either counteract or reinforce each other, depending on the debt maturity structure: (i) firms set higher prices (underinvest in market share) if they have more debt, and (ii) firms engage in dynamic risk-shifting by setting lower (higher) prices if the current debt obligation will be higher (lower) in the next period than in the present period. Using a unique dataset of owner-managed hotels in Austrian ski resorts, we provide empirical evidence of both effects.

We would like to thank the referees, Michael Brennan, Jesus Crespo-Cuaresma, Sudipto Dasgupta, Ron Giammarino, Denis Gromb, Michael Halling, Gregor Hoch, Markus Hochradl, Hans-Georg Kantner, Vojislav Maksimovic, Robert McDonald, Dennis C. Mueller, Klaus Ritzberger, Judith Spiegl, Neal Stoughton, and Josef Zechner for helpful discussions and suggestions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.