Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on October 25, 2006
Review of Financial Studies 2008 21(6):2635-2676; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhl040
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/6/2635    most recent
hhl040v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanden, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Information Quality and Options

Joel M. Vanden
Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College

Send correspondence to Joel M. Vanden, Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, 100 Tuck Hall, Hanover, NH 03755. E-mail: joel.m.vanden{at}dartmouth.edu

JEL Classification: D8, G1


   Abstract

Microstructure researchers have long understood that information quality has an effect on price formation in the underlying asset market. However, option researchers have largely ignored the fact that information quality might also impact the options market. This article characterizes the nature of the impact by showing how option prices and implied volatility levels are related to the forward looking information quality path. This result follows from a noisy rational expectations model that abandons the normal distribution in favor of the gamma distribution, but maintains the standard assumption of exponential utility. Thus the new model bridges the gap between the microstructure literature that relies so heavily on the normal-exponential framework, and the options literature that relies exclusively on models that are consistent with the limited liability of stock prices. The model's tractability allows for a robustness check against the standard framework and provides a viable setting for analyzing the empirical implications of information quality for the options market.


I thank Henry Cao, Roger Craine, Richard Green, Nils Hakansson, Mark Rubinstein, Matt Spiegel (the editor), and two anonymous referees for helpful comments. This paper is based on Chapter 3 of my dissertation at UC Berkeley. Research support from the Tuck School of Business, the Haas School at UC Berkeley, and the NASDAQ Educational Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. Any errors are mine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.