Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on June 19, 2008
Review of Financial Studies 2009 22(1):41-77; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn063
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/41    most recent
hhn063v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ivashina, V.
Right arrow Articles by Stover, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Bank Debt and Corporate Governance

Victoria Ivashina
Harvard University

Vinay B. Nair
Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Anthony Saunders
Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University

Nadia Massoud
Schulich School of Business, York University

Roger Stover
Iowa State University

Send correspondence to Victoria Ivashina, Harvard Business School, Baker Library 233, Boston, MA 02116, or telephone (617) 495-8018, or fax (617) 495-6198, or e-mail: vivashina{at}hbs.edu.

JEL Classification: G10, G20, G21, G34


   Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the disciplining role of banks and bank debt in the market for corporate control. We find that relationship bank lending intensity and bank client network have positive effects on the probability of a borrowing firm becoming a target. This effect is enhanced in cases where the target and acquirer have a relationship with the same bank. Moreover, we utilize an experiment to show that the effects of relationship bank lending intensity on takeover probability are not driven by endogeneity. Finally, we also investigate reasons motivating a bank's informational role in the market for corporate control.


The authors would like to thank an anonymous referee, the editors, Yakov Amihud, Allen Berger, Andrew Metrick, and Randall Morck as well as seminar participants at the Australasian Conference of Banking and Finance, the European Financial Association Meeting in Maastricht, for helpful comments. Guo Hou, Rahul Ravi, Igor Semenenko, and Federica Pazzaglia provided excellent research assistance. Massoud would like to acknowledge financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.