Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on August 26, 2008
Review of Financial Studies 2009 22(4):1477-1504; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn079
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/4/1477    most recent
hhn079v2
hhn079v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenkinson, T.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

IPO Pricing and Allocation: A Survey of the Views of Institutional Investors

Tim Jenkinson
Saïd Business School, Oxford University and CEPR

Howard Jones
Saïd Business School, Oxford University

Send correspondence to Tim Jenkinson, Saïd Business School, Park End Street, Oxford OX1 1HP, UK; telephone: +44-(0)1865-288916; fax: +44-(0)1865-288805. E-mail: tim.jenkinson{at}sbs.ox.ac.uk

JEL Classification: G23, G24


   Abstract

Despite the central importance of investors to all initial public offering (IPO) theories, relatively little is known about their role in practice. This article is based on a survey of how institutional investors assess IPOs, what information they provide to the investment banking syndicate, and the factors they believe influence allocations. We find that investor characteristics, in particular brokerage relationships with the bookrunner, are perceived to be the most important factors influencing allocations, which supports the view that IPO allocations are part of implicit quid pro quo deals with investment banks. The survey raises doubts as to the extent of information production or revelation.


We are very grateful to the Investment Management Association, in particular Tina Johnson, Jane Lowe, and Gordon Midgely, and to the Alternative Investment Management Association, in particular Mary Richardson and Emma Mugridge, for their support in distributing and promoting the survey to their members. We would also like to thank all the respondents to the survey. We received useful comments from two anonymous referees, Alan Morrison, and seminar participants at the Swedish Institute for Financial Research and the 2007 AFA conference.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.