Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on August 6, 2009
Review of Financial Studies 2009 22(9):3329-3365; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhp057
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/9/3329    most recent
hhp057v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cremers, K. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Petajisto, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

How Active Is Your Fund Manager? A New Measure That Predicts Performance

K. J. Martijn Cremers
International Center for Finance, Yale School of Management

Antti Petajisto
International Center for Finance, Yale School of Management

Send correspondence to Antti Petajisto, Yale School of Management, PO Box 208200, New Haven, CT 06520-8200; telephone: (203) 436-0666. E-mail: antti.petajisto{at}yale.edu. Web page: http://www.petajisto.net/

JEL Classification: G10, G14, G20, G23


   Abstract

We introduce a new measure of active portfolio management, Active Share, which represents the share of portfolio holdings that differ from the benchmark index holdings. We compute Active Share for domestic equity mutual funds from 1980 to 2003. We relate Active Share to fund characteristics such as size, expenses, and turnover in the cross-section, and we also examine its evolution over time. Active Share predicts fund performance: funds with the highest Active Share significantly outperform their benchmarks, both before and after expenses, and they exhibit strong performance persistence. Nonindex funds with the lowest Active Share underperform their benchmarks.


We wish to thank Nick Barberis, Jonathan Berk, Lauren Cohen, Roger Edelen, Frank Fabozzi, Andrea Frazzini, Will Goetzmann, John Griffin, Marcin Kacperczyk, Owen Lamont, Juhani Linnainmaa, Ludovic Phalippou, Andrei Shleifer, Clemens Sialm, Matthew Spiegel, Russ Wermers, Lu Zheng, and Eric Zitzewitz for comments, as well as conference and seminar participants at the AFA 2007 Annual Meeting, CFEA 2006, CRSP Forum 2006, EFA 2007 Annual Meeting, FRA 2006 Annual Meeting, NBER Asset Pricing Meeting, NYU Stern Five-Star Conference, AllianceBernstein, Barclays Global Investors, Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Morningstar Investment Conference, Super Bowl of Indexing, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Securities and Exchange Commission, Amsterdam University, Baruch College, Boston College, Helsinki School of Economics, ISCTE Business School (Lisbon), Tilburg University, University of Chicago, University of Maryland, University of Texas at Austin, University of Vienna, and Yale School of Management. We are also grateful to Barra, Frank Russell Co., Standard & Poor's, and Wilshire Associates for providing data for this study.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.