Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on August 26, 2008
Review of Financial Studies 2009 22(9):3367-3409; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn078
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/9/3367    most recent
hhn078v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

On the Relation Between the Credit Spread Puzzle and the Equity Premium Puzzle

Long Chen
Michigan State University

Pierre Collin-Dufresne
Columbia University and NBER

Robert S. Goldstein
University of Minnesota and NBER

Address correspondence to Robert Goldstein, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Room 3-122, 321-19th Ave. South, Minneapolis, MN. E-mail: golds144{at}umn.edu.

JEL Classification: G12, G13


   Abstract

Structural models of default calibrated to historical default rates, recovery rates, and Sharpe ratios typically generate Baa–Aaa credit spreads that are significantly below historical values. However, this "credit spread puzzle" can be resolved if one accounts for the fact that default rates and Sharpe ratios strongly covary; both are high during recessions and low during booms. As a specific example, we investigate credit spread implications of the Campbell and Cochrane (1999) pricing kernel calibrated to equity returns and aggregate consumption data. Identifying the historical surplus consumption ratio from aggregate consumption data, we find that the implied level and time variation of spreads match historical levels well.


We thank participants at the Skinance 2005 Conference in Norway, the 2005 Wharton conference on "Credit Risk and Asset Pricing," the BIS 2004 workshop on credit risk in Basel, the Moody's-KMV MAARC meeting, the AFA 2006 annual meeting, the San Francisco FED, The Washington FED, Columbia University, Stanford University, the University of California at Berkeley, University of British Columbia, and New York University for insightful comments. We are especially thankful to Monika Piazzesi, Pietro Veronesi, Raman Uppal (the editor), and an anonymous referee for their comments.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REV FINANC STUDHome page
H. S. Bhamra, L.-A. Kuehn, and I. A. Strebulaev
The Levered Equity Risk Premium and Credit Spreads: A Unified Framework
Rev. Financ. Stud., October 26, 2009; (2009) hhp082v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.