Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (99)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by George, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nimalendran, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow G12 - Asset Pricing; Trading volume; Bond Interest Rates
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rev Fin 1991; 4:623-656
© 1991 the Society for Financial Studies


Article

Estimation of the bid - ask spread and its components: a new approach

TJ George1, G Kaul2 and M Nimalendran3
1 Ohio State University, Ohio, USA
2 School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
3 University of Florida, Florida, USA

Abstract

We show that time variation in expected returns and/or partial price adjustments lead to a downward bias in previous estimators of both the spread and its components. We introduce a new approach that provides unbiased and efficient estimators of the components of the spread. We find that between 77 and 97 percent of the downward bias in previous spread estimate is caused by time variation in expected returns. More importantly, the adverse-selection component, though significant, accounts for a much smaller proportion (8 to 13 percent) of the quoted spread, at least for small trades, than the proportion (over 40 percent) previously reported in the literature. Order processing costs are the predominant component of quoted spreads.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICSHome page
R. Pascual and D. Veredas
Does the Open Limit Order Book Matter in Explaining Informational Volatility?
J. Financial Econometrics, October 12, 2009; (2009) nbp021v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
REV FINANC STUDHome page
S. T. Bharath, P. Pasquariello, and G. Wu
Does Asymmetric Information Drive Capital Structure Decisions?
Rev. Financ. Stud., August 1, 2009; 22(8): 3211 - 3243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICSHome page
M. Ubukata and K. Oya
Estimation and Testing for Dependence in Market Microstructure Noise
J. Financial Econometrics, April 1, 2009; 7(2): 106 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Emerging Market FinanceHome page
P. Dupuy
Imperfect Information and Contagion in Capital Markets: A Test on Emerging Markets Sovereign Bonds
Journal of Emerging Market Finance, August 1, 2008; 7(2): 103 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of FinanceHome page
M. G. Romano
Learning, Cascades, and Transaction Costs
Review of Finance, July 9, 2007; (2007) rfm011v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
REV FINANC STUDHome page
E. R. Odders-White and M. J. Ready
Credit Ratings and Stock Liquidity
Rev. Financ. Stud., March 1, 2006; 19(1): 119 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.