| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rev Fin 1996; 9:757-785
© 1996 the Society for Financial Studies
Article |
Collusion in uniform-price auctions: experimental evidence and implication for treasury auctions
1 Fordham University
2 Georgia State University and Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, USA
3 Georgia State University, USA
Abstract
We provide experimental evidence that nonbinding preplay communication between bidders in auctions of shares facilitates the adoption of equilibrium strategies: collusive strategies in uniform-price auctions, and the unique equilibrium in undominated strategies in discriminatory auctions. When communication between bidders is introduced, clearing prices and auctioneer profits in uniform-price auctions fall below those observed in discriminatory auctions. This evidence suggests that uniform-price auctions of Treasury securities may result in lower revenues than the currently employed discriminatory procedure.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Sade, C. Schnitzlein, and J. F. Zender Competition and Cooperation in Divisible Good Auctions: An Experimental Examination Rev. Financ. Stud., March 1, 2006; 19(1): 195 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kremer and K. G. Nyborg Underpricing and Market Power in Uniform Price Auctions Rev. Financ. Stud., July 1, 2004; 17(3): 849 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
