| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rev Fin 1996; 9:1033-1059
© 1996 the Society for Financial Studies
Article |
Temporary components of stock returns: What do the data tell us?
1 Department of Finance, School of Business and Public Administration, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
2 Washington University, USA
Abstract
Within the past few years several articles have suggested that returns on large equity portfolios may contain a significant predictable component at horizons 3 to 6 years. Subsequently, the tests used in these analyses have been criticized (appropriately) for having widely misunderstood size and power, rendering the conclusions inappropriate. This criticism however has not focused on the data, it addressed the properties of the tests. In this article we adopt a subjectivist analysis - treating the data as fixed - to ascertain whether the data have anything to say about the permanent/temporary decomposition. The data speak clearly and they tell us that for all intents and purposes, stock prices follow a random walk.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Welch and A. Goyal A Comprehensive Look at The Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction Rev. Financ. Stud., July 1, 2008; 21(4): 1455 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
