Skip Navigation



RFS Advance Access published online on April 19, 2008

Review of Financial Studies, doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn041
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yun, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Choice of Corporate Liquidity and Corporate Governance

Hayong Yun
University of Notre Dame

Address correspondence to Hayong Yun, Department of Finance, 242 Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556; telephone: +574-631-9322; fax: +574-631-5255; e-mail: hyun{at}nd.edu.

JEL Classification: G32, G34


   Abstract

In this paper, I study how corporate governance influences firms’ choices between cash and lines of credit. Stakeholders may disagree about firms’ liquidity choices because they differ in the allocation of ex-post control rights for the firms’ liquidity reserves. Using state-level changes in takeover protection as exogenous shocks to corporate governance, I find that firms increase cash relative to lines of credit when the threat of takeover weakens. Consistent with the theory, this tendency is weaker for firms with good internal governance. Overall, my findings suggest the choice of corporate liquidity is a channel through which corporate governance works.


This paper is a revised version of the first chapter of my dissertation completed at Columbia University. I thank the members of my dissertation committee: Kenneth Ayotte, Patrick Bolton, Charles Himmelberg, Francisco Perez-Gonzalez, and especially the chairman, Suresh Sundaresan. This article has greatly benefited from comments made by Robert Battalio, Charles Calomiris, Charles Hadlock, Steven Drucker, Stuart Gillan, Victoria Ivashina, Eslyn Jean-Baptiste, Wei Jiang, Michael Kollo, Bill McDonald, Daniel Paravisini, Joshua Rauh, Matthew Rhodes-Kropf, Tano Santos, Paul Schultz, Amir Sufi, and Vikrant Vig. Additionally, this article benefited enormously from detailed comments and suggestions from the editor (Michael Weisbach) and an anonymous referee. I thank seminar participants at the Fifth Annual Trans-Atlantic Doctoral Conference (London Business School), 2006 FMA Annual Meeting, Columbia University, Michigan State University, University of Notre Dame, University of South Carolina, and York University for helpful suggestions. I also thank Kirsten Bergstrand, Hang Li, Kristen Morphew, Michelle Parad, and Ed Preuss for their data support.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.