Skip Navigation



RFS Advance Access published online on March 25, 2009

Review of Financial Studies, doi:10.1093/rfs/hhp015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Return Reversals, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Expected Returns

Wei Huang
Shidler College of Business, University of Hawaii at Manoa

Qianqiu Liu
Shidler College of Business, University of Hawaii at Manoa

S. Ghon Rhee
SKKU Business School (Korea) and Shidler College of Business, University of Hawaii at Manoa

Liang Zhang
Faculty of Economics and Commerce, University of Melbourne

Send correspondence to Qianqiu Liu, Shidler College of Business, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2404 Maile Way, Honolulu, HI 96822; telephone: 808-956-8736; fax: 808-956-9887. E-mail: qianqiu{at}hawaii.edu.

JEL Classification: G12, C13


   Abstract

The empirical evidence on the cross-sectional relation between idiosyncratic risk and expected stock returns is mixed. We demonstrate that the omission of the previous month's stock returns can lead to a negatively biased estimate of the relation. The magnitude of the omitted variable bias depends on the approach to estimating the conditional idiosyncratic volatility. Although a negative relation exists when the estimate is based on daily returns, it disappears after return reversals are controlled for. Return reversals can explain both the negative relation between value-weighted portfolio returns and idiosyncratic volatility and the insignificant relation between equal-weighted portfolio returns and idiosyncratic volatility. In contrast, there is a significantly positive relation between the conditional idiosyncratic volatility estimated from monthly data and expected returns. This relation remains robust after controlling for return reversals.


We thank an anonymous referee and Matthew Spiegel (the editor) for providing many valuable comments that helped us significantly improve the article. We are also grateful for useful comments from Zhi Da, Jack De Jong, David McLean, Greg Stone, Zhe Zhang, and the seminar and conference participants at Peking University, Sun Yat-sen University, University of New South Wales, University of Tokyo, Xiamen University, 2006 Financial Management Association Annual Meeting, 2007 China International Conference in Finance, 2007 European Financial Management Association Annual Meeting, and 2008 AsianFA-NFA International Conference. All errors are ours.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.