Skip Navigation



RFS Advance Access published online on May 6, 2009

Review of Financial Studies, doi:10.1093/rfs/hhp035
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Todorov, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Variance Risk-Premium Dynamics: The Role of Jumps

Viktor Todorov
Kellogg School of Management

Send correspondence to Viktor Todorov, Kellogg School of Management, 2001 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208; telephone: 847-467-0694. E-mail: v-todorov{at}kellogg.northwestern.edu.

JEL Classification: C51, C52, G12, G13


   Abstract

Using high-frequency stock market data and (synthetic) variance swap rates, this paper identifies and investigates the temporal variation in the market variance risk-premium. The variance risk is manifest in two salient features of financial returns: stochastic volatility and jumps. The pricing of these two components is analyzed in a general semiparametric framework. The key empirical results imply that investors' fears of future jumps are especially sensitive to recent jump activity and that their willingness to pay for protection against jumps increases significantly immediately after the occurrence of jumps. This in turn suggests that time-varying risk aversion, as previously documented in the literature, is primarily driven by large, or extreme, market moves. The dynamics of risk-neutral jump intensity extracted from deep out-of-the-money put options confirms these findings.


This paper is part of my PhD dissertation at the Department of Economics, Duke University. I would like to thank my advisors George Tauchen, Tim Bollerslev, Ron Gallant, and Han Hong for many discussions and encouragement. I would also like to thank the editor (Joel Hasbrouck) and anonymous referees for many helpful suggestions. I benefited also from comments, suggestions, and discussions with Yacine Ait-Sahalia, Torben Andersen, Ravi Bansal, Alan Bester, Nick Bloom, Mike Chernov, Javier Cicco, Gregory Connor, Darrell Duffie, Rob Engle, Stephen Figlewski, Joel Hasbrouck, Jean Jacod, Ravi Jagannathan, Robert Jarrow, Pedro Duarte, Paul Dudenhefer, Silvana Krasteva, Jonathan Mattingly, Ernesto Mordecki, Mark Podolskij, Barbara Rossi, Albert Shiryaev, Chris Sims, Ken Singleton, and Costis Skiadas; from seminar and conference participants at the Board of Governors, Carnegie-Mellon, Chicago GSB, Duke, Kellogg, LSE, NYU-Stern, Princeton, Stanford GSB; from the Conference on Stochastics in Science in Honor of Ole Barndorff-Nielsen, Guanajuato, Mexico, March 2006; and from the Financial Econometrics conference, Montreal, May 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.