Skip Navigation



RFS Advance Access published online on May 27, 2009

Review of Financial Studies, doi:10.1093/rfs/hhp044
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehran, H.
Right arrow Articles by Peristiani, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Financial Visibility and the Decision to Go Private

Hamid Mehran
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Research and Statistics Group

Stavros Peristiani
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Research and Statistics Group

Send correspondence to Stavros Peristiani, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Research and Statistics Group, Main 3, 33 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10045; telephone: 212-720-7829; fax: 212-720-8363. E-mail: steve.peristiani{at}ny.frb.org.

JEL Classification: G34


   Abstract

A large fraction of the companies that went private between 1990 and 2007 were fairly young public firms, often with the same management team making the crucial restructuring decisions at both the time of the initial public offering (IPO) and the buyout. This article investigates the determinants of the decision to go private over a firm's entire public life cycle. Our evidence reveals that firms with declining growth in analyst coverage, falling institutional ownership, and low stock turnover were more likely to go private and opted to do so sooner. We argue that a primary reason behind the decision of IPO firms to abandon their public listing was a failure to attract a critical mass of financial visibility and investor interest.


We would like to acknowledge the helpful comments of Paul Andre, Sridhar Arcot, Timothy Burley, Daniel Cohen, Rebel Cole, Martijn Cremers, Harry DeAngelo, Steven Drucker, Michael Fleming, David Hirshleifer, Edie Hotchkiss, Tom Martinsen, Daniel Paravisini, Henri Servaes, Rodrigo Verdi, Maya Waisman, and Ross Watts. This article also benefited from seminars at the 2006 CRSP Forum, the 2006 EFMA meetings, the 2006 London Business School Accounting Symposium, the MIT Accounting Workshop, the 2006 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Conference on Private Equity, the 2008 ESSEC Private Equity Conference, and at Bocconi University, DePaul University, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. We would also like to thank Paul Goldsmith, Michael Suher, and Vanessa Savino for valuable research assistance. The article substantially benefitted from the suggestions of the editor, Matthew Spiegel, and two anonymous referees. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.