Skip Navigation



RFS Advance Access published online on October 7, 2009

Review of Financial Studies, doi:10.1093/rfs/hhp064
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bharath, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Srinivasan, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Lending Relationships and Loan Contract Terms

Sreedhar T. Bharath
Ross School of Business, University of Michigan

Sandeep Dahiya
McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University

Anthony Saunders
Stern School of Business, New York University

Anand Srinivasan
Department of Finance, NUS Business School and Risk Management Institute, National University of Singapore

Send correspondence to Sreedhar T. Bharath, Ross School of Business, Department of Finance, University of Michigan, Suite R3332, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; telephone: (734) 763-0485. E-mail: sbharath{at}umich.edu

JEL Classification: D82, G3, G20, G21, G24, L14, N20


   Abstract

We find that repeated borrowing from the same lender translates into a 10–17 bps lowering of loan spreads and that relationships are especially valuable when borrower transparency is low. These results hold using multiple approaches (propensity score matching, instrumental variables, and treatment effects model) that control for the endogeneity of relationships. We also provide a demarcation line between relationship and transactional lending. Spreads charged for relationship loans and nonrelationship loans are statistically identical if the borrower is in the largest 30% by asset size; has public rated debt; or is part of the S&P 500 index. Past relationships reduce collateral requirements and are also associated with obtaining larger loans. Our results imply that, even for firms that have multiple sources of outside financing, borrowing from a prior lender obtains better loan terms.


Bharath acknowledges the research support of the Ross School of Business, University of Michigan. Srinivasan acknowledges the support of NUS research grants R-315-000-066-112 and R-315-000-066-133. The authors thank seminar participants at the University of Michigan, Boston College, Wharton School of Business, Indian School of Business, and Georgetown University. They thank conference participants at the Indian School of Business, participants at the Financial Intermediation Research Society conference 2008 in Anchorage, American Finance Association 2009 conference in San Francisco, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Conference, and 2006 Wharton Financial Intermediation Conference. They also thank Viral Acharya, Franklin Allen, Sumit Agarwal, Mark Carey, Doug Diamond, Mark Flannery, Anjan Thakor, and Tansel Yilmazer for their comments. All errors are those of the authors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.