Skip Navigation



RFS Advance Access published online on September 16, 2009

Review of Financial Studies, doi:10.1093/rfs/hhp066
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiang, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Endogenous Entry and Partial Adjustment in IPO Auctions: Are Institutional Investors Better Informed?

Yao-Min Chiang
Department of Finance, National Chengchi University

Yiming Qian
Department of Finance, University of Iowa

Ann E. Sherman
Department of Finance, DePaul University

Send correspondence to Yiming Qian, Department of Finance, University of Iowa, S382 Pappajohn Business Building, 21 E. Market Street, Iowa City, IA 52242; telephone: (319) 335-0934; fax: (319) 335-3690. E-mail: yiming-qian{at}uiowa.edu.

JEL Classification: G24, G28, G32


   Abstract

Using a unique dataset of complete bid information for every IPO auction in Taiwan during 1995–2000, we examine the behaviors and returns of two groups—institutional and retail investors—in a setting in which underwriters do not have pricing or allocation discretion. We find that the bids of institutional investors are generally consistent with the predictions of IPO auction theory for informed bidders, while those of individual investors are not. Specifically, returns are higher when more institutional investors enter the auction or bid higher prices, suggesting institutional investors are informed and are also able to shave bids adequately. However, individual investors as a group exhibit return-chasing behavior, are uninformed, and systematically overbid.


We would like to thank Robert Battalio, Walid Busaba, Tom Chemmanur, Phil Davis, David Goldreich, Satadru Hore, Ravi Jagannathan, Andrei Jirnyi, Tim Loughran, Paul Schultz, Sophie Shive, Andrei Shleifer, Ashish Tiwari, Tong Yao, Hayong Yun, and seminar participants at the University of Notre Dame, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, DePaul University, the University of Illinois at Chicago, the 2007 Western Finance Association Meetings, and the 2009 American Finance Association Meetings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.