Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on March 26, 2004
Review of Financial Studies 2005 18(1):197-239; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhh007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/1/197    most recent
hhh007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yao, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow G11 - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
Right arrow R31 - Housing Supply and Markets
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Review of Financial Studies Vol. 18, No. 1 © 2005 The Society for Financial Studies; all rights reserved.

Optimal Consumption and Portfolio Choices with Risky Housing and Borrowing Constraints

Rui Yao
Baruch College, City University of New York

Harold H. Zhang
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Address correspondence to: Harold Zhang, Kenan-Flagler Business School, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, or e-mail: zhangha{at}kenan-flagler.unc.edu.

We examine the optimal dynamic portfolio decisions for investors who acquire housing services from either renting or owning a house. Our results show that when indifferent between owning and renting, investors owning a house hold a lower equity proportion in their net worth (bonds, stocks, and home equity), reflecting the substitution effect, yet hold a higher equity proportion in their liquid portfolios (bonds and stocks), reflecting the diversification effect. Furthermore, following the suboptimal policy of always renting leads investors to overweigh in stocks, while following the suboptimal policy of always owning a house causes investors to underweigh in stocks.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 REV FINANC STUDHome page
D. A. Love
The Effects of Marital Status and Children on Savings and Portfolio Choice
Rev. Financ. Stud., April 7, 2009; (2009) hhp020v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.