Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on July 1, 2006
Review of Financial Studies 2007 20(3):709-740; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhl014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/709    most recent
hhl014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chordia, T.
Right arrow Articles by Subrahmanyam, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow G11 - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
Right arrow G14 - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

The Cross-Section of Expected Trading Activity

Tarun Chordia
Goizueta Business School, Emory University

Sahn-Wook Huh
Faculty of Business, Brock University

Avanidhar Subrahmanyam
The Anderson School University of California at Los Angeles

Address correspondence to Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, Anderson School, University of California at Los Angeles, 110 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1481, or e-mail: subra{at}anderson.ucla.edu.

This article studies cross-sectional variations in trading activity for a comprehensive sample of NYSE/AMEX and Nasdaq stocks over a period of about 40 years. We test whether trading activity depends upon the degree of liquidity trading, the mass of informed traders, and the extent of uncertainty and dispersion of opinion about fundamental values. We hypothesize that liquidity (or noise) trading depends both on a stock’s visibility and on portfolio rebalancing needs triggered by past price performance. We use firm size, age, price, and the book-to-market ratio as proxies for a firm’s visibility. The mass of informed agents is proxied by the number of analysts whereas forecast dispersion and firm leverage proxy for differences of opinion. Earning volatility and absolute earning surprises proxy for uncertainty about fundamental values. Overall, the results provide support for theories of trading based on stock visibility, portfolio rebalancing needs, differences of opinion, and uncertainty about fundamental values.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 REV FINANC STUDHome page
T. Chordia, S.-W. Huh, and A. Subrahmanyam
Theory-Based Illiquidity and Asset Pricing
Rev. Financ. Stud., September 1, 2009; 22(9): 3629 - 3668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 REV FINANC STUDHome page
P. A. Gompers, J. Ishii, and A. Metrick
Extreme Governance: An Analysis of Dual-Class Firms in the United States
Rev. Financ. Stud., May 2, 2009; (2009) hhp024v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.