Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on January 22, 2007
Review of Financial Studies 2007 20(4):1059-1086; doi:10.1093/revfin/hhm002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/4/1059    most recent
hhm002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathews, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D44 - Auctions
Right arrow G32 - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure
Right arrow G34 - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies.

Optimal Equity Stakes and Corporate Control

Richmond D. Mathews
Fuqua School of Business, Duke University

Address correspondence to Richmond D. Mathews, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Box 90120, Durham, NC, 27708, or telephone (919) 660-8026, or e-mail: rmathews{at}duke.edu

JEL: D44, G32, G34


   Abstract

I show that firms may optimally sell blocks of their own equity to other firms in anticipation of future corporate control activity. In the model, a target and one potential acquirer, who may also be an alliance partner, can negotiate before synergy values are learned. I find that equity implements an optimal mechanism, allowing the partners to extract surplus from outside bidders who may arrive later. The stake is limited by the outsiders' willingness to investigate. The results imply that corporate control may motivate an equity sale even when no takeover activity is apparent at the time or occurs ex post.


This article is a modified version of Chapter I of my Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Rochester. I am extremely grateful for the advice and support of my dissertation committee, Mike Barclay, Erwan Morellec, and Bill Schwert. I also thank Mike Fishman, Ty Harris, Ludger Hentschel, Tracy Lewis, John Long, Pino Lopomo, Leslie Marx, David Robinson, Dan Rogers, Cliff Smith, Lance Young, seminar participants at Duke, Tulane, and the University of Texas (Austin), as well as Bob McDonald (the editor) and an anonymous referee for helpful comments and discussions. All remaining errors are mine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.