RFS Advance Access originally published online on February 28, 2008
Review of Financial Studies 2008 21(3):1187-1222; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Spline-GARCH Model for Low-Frequency Volatility and Its Global Macroeconomic Causes
Stern School of Business, New York University
Stern School of Business, New York University
Address correspondence to Robert F. Engle, Department of Finance, Stern School of Business, New York University, 44 West Fourth Street, Suite 9-62, New York, NY 10012-1126; telephone: (212)-998-0710; fax: (212)-995-4220; e-mail: rengle{at}stern.nyu.edu
JEL Classification: C14, C22, G10, G15, E44
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Twenty-five years of volatility research has left the macroeconomic environment playing a minor role. This paper proposes modeling equity volatilities as a combination of macro- economic effects and time series dynamics. High-frequency return volatility is specified to be the product of a slow-moving component, represented by an exponential spline, and a unit GARCH. This slow-moving component is the low-frequency volatility, which in this model coincides with the unconditional volatility. This component is estimated for nearly 50 countries over various sample periods of daily data. Low-frequency volatility is then modeled as a function of macroeconomic and financial variables in an unbalanced panel with a variety of dependence structures. It is found to vary over time and across countries. The low-frequency component of volatility is greater when the macroeconomic factors of GDP, inflation, and short-term interest rates are more volatile or when inflation is high and output growth is low. Volatility is higher not only for emerging markets and markets with small numbers of listed companies and market capitalization relative to GDP, but also for large economies. The model allows long horizon forecasts of volatility to depend on macroeconomic developments, and delivers estimates of the volatility to be anticipated in a newly opened market.
We would like to thank the editor, Yacine Aït-Sahalia, two anonymous referees, Torben Andersen, Tim Bollerslev, Eric Ghysels, James Hamilton, Bruce Lehmann, Allan Timmermann, and seminar participants at New York University, Rutgers University, University of California Riverside, University of Copenhagen, University of Montreal, the Econometric Society World Congress 2005, the JAE Conference 2005, the Bank of Mexico, and the Czech National Bank. Jose Gonzalo Rangel acknowledges financial support from the Salomon Center at NYU, UC MEXUS, and Conacyt.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Pascual and D. Veredas Does the Open Limit Order Book Matter in Explaining Informational Volatility? J. Financial Econometrics, October 12, 2009; (2009) nbp021v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. T. Brownlees and G. M. Gallo Comparison of Volatility Measures: a Risk Management Perspective J. Financial Econometrics, July 27, 2009; (2009) nbp009v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|