Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on September 18, 2006
Review of Financial Studies 2008 21(5):2097-2137; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhl035
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/5/2097    most recent
hhl035v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lustig, H.
Right arrow Articles by Van Nieuwerburgh, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow G10 - General
Right arrow G12 - Asset Pricing; Trading volume; Bond Interest Rates
Right arrow G14 - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies
Right arrow G33 - Bankruptcy; Liquidation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Returns on Human Capital: Good News on Wall Street is Bad News on Main Street

Hanno Lustig
UCLA

Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
NYU Stern

Address correspondence to Hanno Lustig, Department of Economics, UCLA, Box 951477 Los Angeles, CA, or e-mail: hlustig{at}econ.ucla.edu

JEL Classification: G12, G14, G33


   Abstract

We use a standard single-agent model to conduct a simple consumption growth accounting exercise. Consumption growth is driven by news about current and expected future returns on the market portfolio. We impute the residual of consumption growth innovations that cannot be attributed to either news about financial asset returns or future labor income growth to news about expected future returns on human wealth, and we back out the implied human wealth and market return process. Innovations in current and future human wealth returns are negatively correlated with innovations in current and future financial asset returns, regardless of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution.


The authors would like to thank the editor, Tobias Moskowitz, two very helpful referees, as well as Andy Atkeson, Raffaella Giacomini, Robert Hall, Chad Jones, Martin Lettau, Sydney Ludvigson, Alex Michaelides, Laura Veldkamp, and the participants of the UCLA brown bag lunch, the NYU macro-finance reading group and macrolunch, seminar participants at the University of California at Berkeley, Stanford, USC, Pompeu Fabra, the LSE, the Bank of England, the University of California at San Diego, the Stockholm Institute for Financial Research, the University of Frankfurt, and the participants of the 2005 SED meetings, the 2005 NBER Summer Institute Asset Pricing Meetings, and the 2006 AEA meetings. We are especially grateful to John Campbell, Lars Peter Hansen and Francis Longstaff for detailed comments. We have benefited from conversations with John Heaton and Tano Santos about related ideas. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No 0550910.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.