Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on November 27, 2008
Review of Financial Studies 2009 22(2):783-827; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn099
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/2/783    most recent
hhn099v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bebchuk, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrell, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

What Matters in Corporate Governance?

Lucian Bebchuk
Harvard Law School and NBER

Alma Cohen
Tel-Aviv University Department of Economics, NBER, and Harvard Law School Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business

Allen Ferrell
Harvard Law School and ECGI

Send correspondence to Lucian Bebchuk, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA 02138; telephone: (617) 495-3138; fax: (617) 812-0554; E-mail: bebchuk{at}law.harvard.edu.

JEL Classification: G30, G34, K22


   Abstract

We investigate the relative importance of the twenty-four provisions followed by the Investor Responsibility Research Center (IRRC) and included in the Gompers, Ishii, and Metrick governance index (Gompers, Ishii, and Metrick 2003). We put forward an entrenchment index based on six provisions: staggered boards, limits to shareholder bylaw amendments, poison pills, golden parachutes, and supermajority requirements for mergers and charter amendments. We find that increases in the index level are monotonically associated with economically significant reductions in firm valuation as well as large negative abnormal returns during the 1990–2003 period. The other eighteen IRRC provisions not in our entrenchment index were uncorrelated with either reduced firm valuation or negative abnormal returns.


For those wishing to use the entrenchment index put forward in this paper in their research, data on firms’ entrenchment index levels is available at http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/bebchuk/data.shtml. A list of over seventy-five studies already using the index is available at http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/bebchuk/studies.shtml. For helpful suggestions and discussions, we are grateful to Bernie Black, Victor Chernozhukov, Martijn Cremers, Ray Fisman, Yaniv Grinstein, Robert Marquez, Andrew Metrick, Guhan Subramanian, Greg Taxin, Manuel Trajtenberg, Yishay Yafeh, Rose Zhao, Michael Weisbach (the editor), an anonymous referee, and conference participants at the NBER, Washington University, the Oxford Saïd Business School, Tel-Aviv University, the Bank of Israel, and the ALEA annual meeting. Our work benefited from the financial support of the Nathan Cummins Foundation; the Guggenheim Foundation; the Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business; the Harvard Milton fund; and the Harvard Program on Corporate Governance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.