Skip Navigation


RFS Advance Access originally published online on February 10, 2009
Review of Financial Studies 2009 22(9):3531-3561; doi:10.1093/rfs/hhp007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/9/3531    most recent
hhp007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teo, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

The Geography of Hedge Funds

Melvyn Teo
Singapore Management University

Send correspondence to Melvyn Teo, Singapore Management University, Lee Kong Chian School of Business, 50 Stamford Road, #04-01, Singapore 178899; telephone: +65-6828-0735; fax: +65-6828-0777. E-mail: melvynteo{at}smu.edu.sg.

JEL Classification: G11, G12, G23


   Abstract

This article analyzes the relationship between the risk-adjusted performance of hedge funds and their proximity to investments using data on Asia-focused hedge funds. I find, relative to an augmented Fung and Hsieh (2004) factor model, that hedge funds with a physical presence (head or research office) in their investment region outperform other hedge funds by 3.72% per year. The local information advantage is pervasive across all major geographical regions, but is strongest for emerging market funds and funds holding illiquid securities. These results are robust to adjustments for fund fees, serial correlation, backfill bias, and incubation bias. I show also that distant funds, especially those based in the United States and the United Kingdom, are able to raise more capital, charge higher fees, and set longer redemption periods, despite their underperformance relative to nearby funds. It appears that distant funds trade investment performance for better access to capital.


I thank the editor, Tobias Moskowitz, and an anonymous referee for very helpful comments. I am also indebted to Vikas Agarwal, George Aragon, Guillermo Baquero, Wayne Ferson, Bill Fung, Will Goetzmann, Mila Getmansky, Robert Kosowski, Bing Liang, Narayan Naik, Loriana Pelizzon, and seminar participants at the 2007 Western Finance Association Meetings and the 2007 European Finance Association Meetings for suggestions and discussions. The research assistance of Chuin-Hao Lim and the financial support from the BNP Paribas Hedge Fund Centre at SMU are gratefully acknowledged. This research is inspired by suggestions from Bill Fung.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.