Rev Fin 1996; 9:787-815
© 1996 the Society for Financial Studies
Article |
The role of investment banks in acquisitions
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Abstract
We compare acquisitions completed with and without investment bank advice over the 1981 to 1982 period. We find that the choice to use an investment bank depends on the complexity of the transaction, the type of transaction (takeovers versus acquisitions of assets), the acquiror's prior acquisition experience, and the degree of diversification of the target firm. Although acquisition announcement returns are lower for firms using investment banks, this difference can be explained by differences in transaction characteristics. These results suggest that transaction costs are the main determinant of investment banking choice, followed by contracting costs and asymmetric information costs.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Bodnaruk, M. Massa, and A. Simonov Investment Banks as Insiders and the Market for Corporate Control Rev. Financ. Stud., December 1, 2009; 22(12): 4989 - 5026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
