RFS Advance Access published online on February 23, 2006
Review of Financial Studies, doi:10.1093/rfs/hhj034
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Target firms often face bidders that are not equally well informed, which reduces competition because bidders with less information fear the winners curse more. We analyze how targets should be sold in this situation. We show that a sequential procedure can extract the highest possible transaction price. The target first offers an exclusive deal to a better informed bidder, without considering a less well informed bidder. If rejected, the target either offers an exclusive deal to the less well informed bidder, or a modified first-price auction. Deal protection devices can be used to enhance a target's commitment to the procedure.
Article
Takeover Contests With Asymmetric Bidders
Paul Povel 1 *
and
Rajdeep Singh 2
1 Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
2 Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota
Paul Povel, E-mail: povel{at}umn.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. D. Mathews Optimal Equity Stakes and Corporate Control Rev. Financ. Stud., July 1, 2007; 20(4): 1059 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
