Skip Navigation



RFS Advance Access published online on February 7, 2007

Review of Financial Studies, doi:10.1093/revfin/hhm006
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/5/1359    most recent
hhm006v2
hhm006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cremers, M. K.J.
Right arrow Articles by Wei, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies.

Governance Mechanisms and Bond Prices

Martijn K.J. Cremers, Vinay B. Nair and Chenyang Wei
Yale University
University of Pennsylvania
Federal Reserve Bank of New York

martijn.cremers{at}yale.edu

We investigate the effects of shareholder governance mechanisms on bondholders and document two new findings. First, the impact of shareholder control (proxied by large institutional blockholders) on credit risk depends on takeover vulnerability. Shareholder control is associated with higher (lower) yields if the firm is exposed to (protected from) takeovers. In the presence of shareholder control, the difference in bond yields due to differences in takeover vulnerability can be as high as 66 basis points. Second, event risk covenants reduce the credit risk associated with strong shareholder governance. Therefore, without bond covenants, shareholder governance and bondholder interests diverge.


The authors wish to thank Ed Altman, Paul Gompers, Bill Green, Denis Gromb, Martin Gruber, Kose John, Steve Kaplan, Robert McDonald (the editor), Andrew Metrick, Eli Ofek, Thomas Phillipon, Matthew Richardson, Anthony Saunders, Raghu Sundaram, Robert Whitelaw, Daniel Wolfenzon, Ralph Walking, David Yermack and an anonymous referee, as well as seminar participants at Stern School of Business, Yale University, Maastricht University, Hofstra University, University of Amsterdam, Tsinghua University, Rutgers University, the NBER summer institute, the Annual Finance Symposium at the University of Maryland, the Swedish School of Economics, the American Finance Association, the second annual conference of the Caesarea Center at the IDC Herzliya and the First Annual Asset Pricing Retreat in Amsterdam for helpful comments. Nair gratefully acknowledges support from the Center of Law and Business at NYU. The paper was previously circulated under the title ‘The Congruence of Shareholder and Bondholder Governance’. Address correspondence to K.J.M. Cremers, Yale School of Management, International Center for Finance, Box 208200, 135 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06520-8200, United States


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
R. Bauer, R. Braun, and G. L. Clark
The emerging market for European corporate governance: the relationship between governance and capital expenditures, 1997-2005
J. Econ. Geogr., July 1, 2008; 8(4): 441 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
REV FINANC STUDHome page
K. J. M. Cremers, V. B. Nair, and K. John
Takeovers and the Cross-Section of Returns
Rev. Financ. Stud., April 2, 2008; (2008) hhn032v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.