Skip Navigation

Why Don't Issuers Get Upset About Leaving Money on the Table in IPOs?

  1. Tim Loughran
  1. University of Notre Dame
  1. Jay R. Ritter
  1. University of Florida

    Abstract

    One of the puzzles regarding initial public offerings (IPOs) is that issuers rarely get upset about leaving substantial amounts of money on the table, defined as the number of shares sold times the difference between the first‐day closing market price and the offer price. The average IPO leaves $9.1 million on the table. This number is approximately twice as large as the fees paid to investment bankers and represents a substantial indirect cost to the issuing firm. We present a prospect theory model that focuses on the covariance of the money left on the table and wealth changes. Our reasoning also provides an explanation for a second puzzling pattern: much more money is left on the table following recent market rises than after market falls. This results in an explanation of hot issue markets. We also offer a new explanation for why IPOs are underpriced.

      | Table of Contents

      This Article

      1. Rev. Financ. Stud. 15 (2): 413-444. doi: 10.1093/rfs/15.2.413
      1. » AbstractFree
      2. Full Text (PDF)

      Classifications

      Share

      1. Email this article

      Current Issue

      1. March 2012 25 (3)
      1. Review of Financial Studies
      1. Alert me to new issues

      Most

      Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.